Getting Back @The Bank!

I don't know about you but I get so frustrated with the banking world. So much has become impersonal however what I'm going to write about today I want to preface with the comment that over the years I've been most impressed with our local Bank of Scotland branch staff in Bo'ness. Today was no exception. We were down at the branch this morning tranferring money to a couple of project which we support in India. We couldn't have had better personal service even 50 years ago. However I'm afraid what happens in the friendly community of Bo'ness is seldom reflected in other banking establishments. I came across this piece of correspondence supposedly written by a 98 year old lady to her bank manager. I must confess I couldn't help but identify with her feelings about our impersonalised banking world and I also enjoyed the chuckle as i read her letter. Dear Sir, I am writing to thank you for bouncing my cheque with which I endeavoured to pay my plumber last month. By my calculations, three nanoseconds must have elapsed between his presenting the cheque and the arrival in my account of the funds needed to honour it. I refer, of course, to the automatic monthly deposit of my Pension, an arrangement, which, I admit, has only been in place for a mere thirty eight years. You are to be commended for seizing that brief window of opportunity, and also for debiting my account £30 by way of penalty for the inconvenience caused to your bank. My thankfulness springs from the manner in which this incident has caused me to rethink my errant financial ways. I noticed that whereas I personally attend to your telephone calls and letters, when I try to contact you, I am confronted by the impersonal, overcharging, pre-recorded, faceless entity which your bank has become. From now on, I, like you, choose only to deal with a flesh-and-blood person. My mortgage and loan payments will therefore and hereafter no longer be automatic, but will arrive at your bank by cheque, addressed personally and confidentially to an employee at your bank whom you must nominate. Be aware that it is an offence under the Postal Act for any other person to open such an envelope. Please find attached an Application Contact Status which I require your chosen employee to complete. I am sorry it runs to eight pages, but in order that I know as much about him or her as your bank knows about me, there is no alternative. Please note that all copies of his or her medical history must be countersigned by a Solicitor, and the mandatory details of his/her financial situation (income, debts, assets and liabilities) must be accompanied by documented proof. In due course, I will issue your employee with PIN number which he/she must quote in dealings with me. I regret that it cannot be shorter than 28 digits but, again, I have modelled it on the number of button presses required of me to access my account balance on your phone bank service. As they say, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. Let me level the playing field even further. When you call me, press buttons as follows: 1. To make an appointment to see me. 2. To query a missing payment. 3. To transfer the call to my living room in case I am there. 4. To transfer the call to my bedroom in case I am sleeping. 5. To transfer the call to my toilet in case I am attending to nature. 6. To transfer the call to my mobile phone if I am not at home. 7. To leave a message on my computer (a password to access my computer is required. A password will be communicated to you at a later date for the Authorized Contact.) 8. To return to the main menu, and to listen to options 1 through to 8. 9. To make a general complaint or inquiry, the contact will then be put on hold, pending the attention of my automated answering service. While this may, on occasion, involve a lengthy wait, uplifting music will play for the duration of the call. Regrettably, but again following your example, I must also levy an establishment fee to cover the setting up of this new arrangement. May I wish you a happy, if ever so slightly less prosperous, New Year. Your Humble Client, Myrtle J Watson. (
2 Comments
avatar

Posted By: italker   On: 2 Apr 2010   At: 9:28am

Hi Chris
Here is an interesting fact, I do know of a 70 year old couple who were given a mortgage about ten years ago. They never intended to pay off the mortgage. When the property would be sold the mortgage would be paid off. Ten years ago banks weren’t thinking about negative equity. However like you I think the story may well be made up but it makes a good point.

avatar

Posted By: Chris   On: 2 Apr 2010   At: 12:45am

This is a wonderfully crafted letter, and I share it’s sentiments wholeheartedly,

but, if we are to believe that it’s true, we must also have to believe that a 98 year old woman has a mortgage, which means she must have taken it out at the age of 75 ish years.

I’m not sure many banks hand out mortgages to 75 year olds,

But I would love it to be true anyway.

Leave a reply